Thursday, November 28, 2019

Ambush essays

Ambush essays When reading Ambush by Tim OBrien, I was a little thrown off at first. It seemed to start very abruptly and I wasnt too clear on the direction it was going. There was no real background information, like which war it was about, or even an introduction, so I had to read the first two paragraphs over again to get a better idea. As the story developed, I noticed the way OBrien lead into it, particularly how he set the scene and then used very engaging imagery to illustrate a better picture. For example, Very gradually, in tiny slivers, dawn began to to break through the fog.. The way he describes the setting made me feel like I was right there in the story and watching it all happen. The more detail he used in his writing, the more suspense there was towards what would happen next. Then as he began to recall the systematic way he was thinking, it gave a full understanding of the thoughts going through his mind, and the time frame they happened in. OBrien then explains how he ...did not hate the young man; I did not see him as the enemy; I did not ponder issues of morality or politics or military duty... What I found most interesting was the way he structured his sentences in brief, separate verses, just as his thoughts would have been at the time; very sporadic and inconsistent. This made it more interesting, especially when he balanced out the shorter sentences with longer more descriptive details further along in the story. Then he even continues with a different style of sentence form, switching to dashes: The grenade made a popping noise-not soft but not loud either-not what I expected-and there was a puff of dust and smoke-a small white puff-and the young man seemed to jerk upward as if pulled by invisible wires. He fell on his back. I think the way he structured this sentence in particular was to portray the panic he was feeling, and how quickly i ...

Sunday, November 24, 2019

How to Make Goo-Slime Like a Liquid and Solid

How to Make Goo-Slime Like a Liquid and Solid Make squishy nontoxic goo that hardens in your hands when you squeeze it but flows like a liquid when you pour it. Difficulty: Easy Time Required: Minutes Goo Materials All you need for this project is cornstarch and water. You can add food coloring if desired. Feel free to experiment with the amount of water to see how it affects the properties of the goo. 16-oz. box cornstarchWaterFood coloringBowl Lets Make Goo! Empty the box of cornstarch into a bowl.Add 1 1/2 cups of water.Add about 15 drops of food coloring. Its fine without color, too.Mix the goo with your hands.Store goo in a sealed container when youre done using it. If it dries out, simply add more water. Goo Characteristics Goo is a viscoelastic or non-Newtonian fluid, which means its viscosity (how readily it flows) depends on external conditions, such as pressure, shear, or tensile stress. If you pick up goo, it runs through your fingers. If you squeeze it or punch it, it seems to solidify. The force pushes the water around the cornstarch particles, allowing them to mesh together. Afterward, the water flows back to fill in the gaps. Experiment With Other Liquids Water isnt the only liquid you can use to make goo. Try using vegetable oil or a mixture of oil and water instead. This forms a goo with interesting electrical properties. Watch how this type of goo reacts when you place an electrically charged object near it (like a balloon you rubbed on your hair).

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Qualitative report.How do people develop and maintain friendships at Essay

Qualitative report.How do people develop and maintain friendships at University - Essay Example The friends should enjoy the company of one another, they should be useful for each other in time of problems and needs and this condition is regarded as the most paramount condition for being a good friend. The third pre requisite is that they should share a common belonging with certain idea of concept. In other words they must share the same interests or hobbies that will be a cement substance for the long time relationship. Aristotle supports the same idea of pre-conditions in the friendship. Similarly, Bell and Coleman altercated that friendship is a bond or relationship in which there is not a specific reason for â€Å"self centred† behaviours and these friendship is not necessarily grounded with the intentions of gain or profit. Changingminds.org (2002)   The classical views and conventional ideas supported that in friendship, the constraints of the relationship vary a lot from person to person. For example Graham Allan said that in friendship. The more things which a re weighed are informal behaviours, pleasure, comfort, care and voluntary skills. Because friendship is not based on some pre defined profits, loss or gain, rather it is the culminating need of the humans to have friends in order to support each other, emotionally, mentally and for the fulfilment of societal needs. Resourcelists.st-andrews.ac.uk (2012) According to Aristotle, there are mainly two kinds of friendships at the generic level. First type of friendship that is genuine and the friendship that is not truly genuine. Genuine friendship comprises of the essence and peculiarity of love and care. The other kind of friendship is in turn divided in two kinds. Friendship for pleasure and the other type is friendship for expediency and serviceability. In this kind of friendship the bond is developed with the intention of selfishness in some form or the other. This type of bond is bound to extenuate and abate as no two human beings can either provide pleasure of any kind of utility f or each other indefinitely. In genuine friendship, love is the driving force in the relationship and irrespective of usability and pleasure; the both sides continue to uphold the sanctity of the relationship because it helps to fulfil their spiritual and societal needs. The usability and pleasure is the intended by products of genuine friendship. The genuine friendships are necessary to improve the relationships among the human beings in a society as it brings people closer to each other by instigating a sense of voluntary actions within their nature. Infed.org (1999)   Suzanne Stern-Gillet that the example of friendships that are based on pleasure and utility is just like activities of the normal life because such kind of friendships does not affect the human lives in high magnitudes. If someone has a friend who gives internal pleasure and some kind of gain to the other friend then it will not matter much when this friendship will end because there will be some another one to rep lace the former. But this is not the case in the friendships which have the spirit of love based friendship. Genuine friendships really put effects on people’s life because the peculiar charm in genuine friendship is related with personalities rather than materialistic gains. The personalities are important to each other in genuine friendships and sense of care and responsibility gives boost to this approach of friendship. Plato.stanford.edu (2005) There are numerous theories and practices about the